<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>BuildVsBuy on Neuzida — Media &amp; Technology</title><link>https://neuzida.ai/tags/buildvsbuy/</link><description>Recent content in BuildVsBuy on Neuzida — Media &amp; Technology</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://neuzida.ai/tags/buildvsbuy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Build vs. Buy, Rewritten: Is SaaS Actually Dying?</title><link>https://neuzida.ai/post/build-vs-buy/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://neuzida.ai/post/build-vs-buy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Updated July 3, 2026.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For twenty years, &amp;ldquo;build vs. buy&amp;rdquo; had a boring answer: buy. Why sink engineers into a CRM or a project tracker when someone else already sells a polished one for a few dollars a seat? That logic built the entire software-as-a-service industry. In 2026, it stopped being obvious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call it the &lt;a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/software-stocks-ai-trade-tech-record-quarter-msft-orcl-intu-2026-6?op=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;SaaSpocalypse&lt;/a&gt;. In early 2026, roughly &lt;strong&gt;$300 billion&lt;/strong&gt; of market value evaporated once investors did the math on what AI agents actually replace. The thing that made SaaS printing-press profitable, charging per human seat, only works when you need a lot of humans clicking around in the software. Agents click and do the task themselves, so fewer seats get sold.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>