<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LLMs on Neuzida — Media &amp; Technology</title><link>https://neuzida.ai/tags/llms/</link><description>Recent content in LLMs on Neuzida — Media &amp; Technology</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://neuzida.ai/tags/llms/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Build vs. Buy, Rewritten: Is SaaS Actually Dying?</title><link>https://neuzida.ai/post/build-vs-buy/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://neuzida.ai/post/build-vs-buy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Updated July 3, 2026.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For twenty years, &amp;ldquo;build vs. buy&amp;rdquo; had a boring answer: buy. Why sink engineers into a CRM or a project tracker when someone else already sells a polished one for a few dollars a seat? That logic built the entire software-as-a-service industry. In 2026, it stopped being obvious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call it the &lt;a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/software-stocks-ai-trade-tech-record-quarter-msft-orcl-intu-2026-6?op=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;SaaSpocalypse&lt;/a&gt;. In early 2026, roughly &lt;strong&gt;$300 billion&lt;/strong&gt; of market value evaporated once investors did the math on what AI agents actually replace. The thing that made SaaS printing-press profitable, charging per human seat, only works when you need a lot of humans clicking around in the software. Agents click and do the task themselves, so fewer seats get sold.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>It's Official: Bots Now Outnumber Humans Online</title><link>https://neuzida.ai/post/bots-outnumber-humans/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://neuzida.ai/post/bots-outnumber-humans/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The web just quietly passed a milestone nobody threw a party for. According to &lt;a href="https://radar.cloudflare.com/traffic#bot-vs-human" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Cloudflare&amp;rsquo;s traffic radar&lt;/a&gt;, automated traffic recently crossed the halfway mark, which means more of the internet is now machines than people. Forecasters didn&amp;rsquo;t expect that line to be crossed until 2027. It happened early.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sit with that for a second. When you publish something today, the odds are better than even that the first thing to read it isn&amp;rsquo;t a person. It&amp;rsquo;s a bot, an agent, a crawler, a model quietly ingesting your words to answer someone else&amp;rsquo;s question later.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Quantum Computing and AI: Two Fields That Now Build Each Other</title><link>https://neuzida.ai/post/quantumcomputing/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://neuzida.ai/post/quantumcomputing/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Quantum computing stopped being a someday problem a while ago. What changed most recently isn&amp;rsquo;t the hardware, though that keeps improving. It&amp;rsquo;s the realization that quantum computing and AI have quietly started feeding each other, and that changes how we should think about both, including the cryptography that lets us prove a piece of content is real.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-short-version-of-how-it-works"&gt;The short version of how it works&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A regular computer stores everything as bits, each stuck being either a 0 or a 1. A quantum computer uses qubits, which through a property called superposition can hold a blend of both at once. Add entanglement, where qubits get linked so tightly that measuring one tells you about the others, and you get a machine that can chase many possibilities in parallel rather than one at a time. For a narrow set of problems, that&amp;rsquo;s a genuine leap. For most everyday computing, it does nothing at all, which is a distinction the hype usually skips.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>